Home PsychologyParenting How exposure to stereotypes can hinder performance

How exposure to stereotypes can hinder performance

Credits to the Source Link sweets
How exposure to stereotypes can hinder performance

Children notice stereotypes about race, gender, and
wealth. And their awareness of these stereotypes can have a negative effect on academic performance. But research suggests we can help kids overcome the threat. Here’s what every parent needs to know.

© 2020 Gwen Dewar, Ph.D., all rights reserved


The everyday reality of stereotype threat

Societies everywhere sort people into categories, and
children are paying attention.

Not only do they notice cues about gender, wealth, and
ethnicity, they also perceive the stereotypes that go with these categories. And
it starts early.

  • Toddlers are quick to pick up on cultural norms about gender,
    and apply them to roles, activities, and toys (Halim et al 2016).
  • Four-year-olds expect wealthy students to be more competent
    in the classroom (Shutts et al 2016)
  • Elementary school children are familiar with negative racial
    stereotypes (Wegmann et al 2017). They also tend to believe that members of out-groups are less moral (Liberman et al 2017).

And kids are themselves subjected to bias. As I explain elsewhere, experiments show that Black children are more likely to be misperceived as angry or threatening — even when their facial expressions are neutral (e.g., Halberstadt et al 2020).

What price do we pay for these attitudes?

There are the conspicuous costs: Hate crimes, bullying,
blatant acts of social discrimination and injustice.

But there is also a more subtle cost — the damage caused
when we feel ourselves threatened by a negative stereotype.

People are watching,
expecting me to confirm their prejudices. Can I prove them wrong?

It isn’t so easy because part of our cognitive resources are
distracted. Instead of focusing entirely on the task at hand, we feel compelled
to monitor the threat, and keep our emotions under control. In some cases we
might even feel helpless, or ready to give up.

The problem was first introduced to psychology in the 1990s by
psychologists Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson (1995). They called the
phenomenon “stereotype threat,” and decades of research have confirmed
their original prediction:

People tend to perform worse on
tests when they become self-conscious about negative stereotypes pertaining to
their own ethnicity or sex.

This has been shown for a variety of academic subjects, including mathematics. It has even been shown for tests of fluid intelligence.

For example, in one study, researchers presented a highly-regarded test of fluid, nonverbal intelligence — Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices
(APM) — to Black and White undergraduates (Brown and Ray 2006).

Students took the APM under three different conditions.

  • In one condition, students were given the standard
    instructions for taking the test.
  • In another, students were also told that the APM was an IQ
    test.
  • In a third condition, the APM wasn’t presented as a test at
    all. Students were told that APM was a set of puzzles and that the researchers
    wanted their opinions of them.

Consistent with stereotype threat theory, the Black students
did more poorly than did the White students when the APM was presented as
a test (conditions 1 and 2).

When the APM wasn’t pitched as a test, Black students
performed just as well as White students did.

Is this a problem for young adults only? Older, more
sophisticated minds who’ve had many years to observe stereotypes in action?

Apparently not, because the effect has been replicated on young children as
well.

Michel Désert and his colleagues
presented a version of the Raven’s Matrices to kids in France.

The children ranged
in age from 6 to 9 years, and their performance didn’t vary as a
function of the instructions they received — not if they came from affluent
families.

But the story was different for children
of low socioeconomic status.

These kids performed more poorly on the Raven’s
Matrices if they had been told it was a test of their cognitive ability (Désert et al
2009).

So stereotype threat doesn’t harm
only grown-ups.  Nor is it the special nemesis of any one group. Over the years,
experiments have shown the threat to affect a wide range of individuals,
including

  • elementary school boys who believe that girls are
    academically superior (Hartley and Sutton 2013);
  • young girls reminded of the “girls are bad at mathematics”
    stereotype (Galdi et al 2014; Flore et al 2015);
  • the elderly on cognitive and memory tasks (Lamont et al
    2016);
  • immigrants on tests of verbal achievement (Appel et al 2015);
  • White male college students who, when reminded of the
    stereotype of the Asian mathematics whiz, suffer worse scores on mathematics
    tests (Aronson et al 1999).

Beyond test anxiety: How stereotypes might interfere with learning, and steer kids away from rewarding careers

The effect on test-taking is bad enough. But what if stereotypes do more than undermine test performance? What if they also interfere with a student’s ability to learn in the first place?

There’s good reason to think this is true (Rydell et al 2010; Taylor and Walton 2011).

First, consider working memory — your mind’s ability to track multiple pieces of information at once, and stay focused.

We need good working memory skills to pay attention, follow directions, and execute plans. But working memory is a delicate thing, easily frazzled when we feel threatened.

In experiments, people reminded of negative stereotypes have suffered immediate dips in working memory performance (Pennington et al 2016).

Researchers suspect it’s because they divert precious working memory resources to keep their emotions under control, reducing their capacity to handle other information (van Ast et al 2016).

Second, consider how stereotypes might affect a student’s motivation.

People who feel targeted by negative stereotypes are more likely to discount
the validity or fairness of tests (Lesko and Corpus 2006; Klein et al
2007). Who likes school under these circumstances?

And even positive stereotypes could cause trouble. When individuals believe they belong to a group with “natural ability,” they might put in less effort (Stone 2002).

Can this theory explain all achievement disparities?

No. There are many reasons why some groups outperform others.

For example,
kids raised by traditional Chinese parents
may have several cultural advantages that increase their chances of academic success.

And
in an analysis of research testing the effects of stereotype
threat on women’s math achievement, Gijsbert Stoet and David C. Geary
(2012) report that many studies have suffered from methodological flaws.
When the researchers confined analysis to studies that met their
methodological standards, only 1 in 3 studies detected an effect.

The conflicting results may someday be resolved. For instance, feeling intrinsically powerful tends to
protect individuals from the effects of stereotype threat (van Loo and Rydell
2013; Pillaud et al 2015). So it’s possible that some failures to replicate
reflect differences in perceived power among those taking the tests. 

But regardless, there are good reasons to be
cautious. We shouldn’t assume that stereotype threat accounts for
all social disparities in achievement.

So how do we protect kids from the effects of stereotype threat?

Obviously, we can’t wave a magical wand and remove harmful stereotypes from the public consciousness. But there are some concrete steps we can take to help.

Overcoming the threat: Six evidence-based tips


1. Don’t remind students of group identity before they take a test.

Have you ever taken a standardized test that began by asking you to answer questions about your personal background?

That might be a good way for the test makers to collect demographic data, but it’s bad for the student. When the Educational Testing Service stopped asking students to state
their sex at the beginning of the AP calculus test, female students
improved their scores (Danaher and Crandall 2008).

2. Present children with stereotype-defying role models.

If you need another reason to watch the film, Hidden Figures, with your children, this is it: Experiments suggest that we can counteract stereotype threat by
presenting students with positive role models — extraordinary achievers
who defy social stereotypes.

In some cases, reading about such high achievers helped students perform better on tests (McIntyre et al 2005; Bagès and Martinot 2011).

In other cases, researchers didn’t observe a boost in test performance — not when experiment volunteers had reason to feel personally threatened by a stereotype. But presenting role models still had a beneficial effect: Students subsequently reported a greater interest in pursuing a career similar to that of the role models (Shapiro et al 2012).

3. Before tests, provide students with an opportunity to reflect on their most cherished value.

When people reflect on their values, it seems to have a calming effect. They may feel less threatened by failure, reducing test anxiety.

When researchers tested this tactic on college undergraduates, they found that students became less vulnerable to stereotype threat (Shapiro et al 2013). Merely writing about a cherished value — and describing a situation that illustrated how that value mattered to them — reduced the effects of stereotype threat.

4. Teach students about the psychology of stereotypes.

Simply understanding this phenomenon can help defuse its effects.

In
one study, students performed better on tests after being told that
their test anxiety could be the result of negative stereotypes and has
“nothing to do with your actual ability to do well on the test” (Johns et
al 2005).

5. Encourage children to adopt an effort-based or “growth” theory of ability.

When kids believe that
intelligence is a fixed, unchangeable trait, they may be especially vulnerable to the effects of stereotype threat.

Conversely, embracing a “growth” theory of intelligence seems to
inoculate students against the effects of stereotype threat (Aronson et
al 2002; Good et al 2007; Bagès and Martinot 2011).

For more information, see my article about the “growth” theory of intelligence.

6. Support your child’s working memory skills

Given the evidence that stereotypes can sap working memory, it makes sense to help children maximize their working memory potential. For more information, read these Parenting Science evidence-based tips.



References: Stereotype threat

Appel M, Weber S, and Kronberger N. 2015. The influence of
stereotype threat on immigrants: review and meta-analysis Front Psychol. 6:
900.

Aronson J, Fried CB, and Good C. 2002. Reducing the Effects of
Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping
Theories of Intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38,
113-125.

Aronson J, Lustina MJ, Good C, Keough K, Steele CM, and
Brown J. 1999. When White Men Can’t Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient
Factors in Stereotype Threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
35, 29-46.

Bagès C and Martinot D. 2011. What is the best model for girls and boys faced with a standardized
mathematics evaluation situation: a hardworking role model or a gifted
role model? Br J Soc Psychol. 50(3):536-43.

Brown RP and Ray EA 2006. The difference isn’t black
and white: stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s Advanced
Progressive Matrices. J Appl Psychol. 91(4):979-85.

Danaher K and
Crandall CS. 2008. Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1639-1655.

Désert  M, Préaux M,
and Jund R.  2009. So young and already victims
of stereotype threat: Socio-economic status and performance of 6 to 9 years old
children on Raven’s progressive matrices. European Journal of Psychology of
Education 24(2): 207-218.

Galdi S, Cadinu M, and Tomasetto C. 2013. The Roots of Stereotype Threat: When Automatic Associations Disrupt Girls’ Math Performance. Child Dev. 2013 May 28. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12128. [Epub ahead of print].

Halberstadt AG, Cooke AN, Garner PW, Hughes SA, Oertwig D,
Neupert SD. 2020. Racialized emotion recognition accuracy and anger bias of
children’s faces.
Emotion. 2020 Jul 2. doi: 10.1037/emo0000756. Online ahead of
print.

Hartley BL and Sutton RM. 2013. A stereotype threat account of boys’ academic underachievement. Child Dev. 84(5):1716-33.

Hess TM, Hinson JT, and Hodges EA. 2009. Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults’ memory performance. Exp Aging Res. 35(2):153-77.

Johns M,
Schmader T and Martens A. 2005. Knowing is half the battle: Teaching
stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance.
Psychological Science, 16, 175-179.

Klein O, Pohl S, and
Ndagijimana C. 2007. The influence of intergroup comparisons on
Africans’ intelligence performance in a job selection context. The
Journal of Psychology, 141, 453-467.

Lamont RA, Swift HJ, and Abrams D. 2015. A Review and
Meta-Analysis of Age-Based Stereotype Threat: Negative Stereotypes, Not Facts,
Do the Damage. Psychol Aging. 30(1): 180–193.

Lesko AC and Corpus JH. 2006.
Discounting the difficult: How high math identified women respond to
stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54, 113-125.

Liberman Z, Howard LH, Vasquez NM, Woodward AL. 2017. Children’s
expectations about conventional and moral behaviors of ingroup and outgroup
members. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Apr 9. pii: S0022-0965(17)30171-6.

McIntyre RB, Lord CG,
Gresky DM, Ten Eyck LL, et al. 2005. A social impact trend in the
effects of role models on alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype
threat. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10, 116-136.

Olson KR, Shutts K, Kinzler KD, Weisman KG. 2012. Children
associate racial groups with wealth: evidence from South Africa. Child Dev. 83(6):1884-99.

Pillaud V, Rigaud D, Clémence A. 2015. The Influence of
Chronic and Situational Social Status on Stereotype Susceptibility. PLoS One. 10(12):e0144582.
doi:

Rydell
RJ, Shiffrin RM, Boucher KL, Van Loo K, and Rydell MT. 2010. Stereotype
threat prevents perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul
26. [Epub ahead of print]

Shapiro JR, Williams AM, and Hambarchyan M. 2013. Are All
Interventions Created Equal? A Multi-Threat Approach to Tailoring Stereotype
Threat Interventions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 104(2): 277-288.

Shutts K, Brey EL, Dornbusch LA, Slywotzky N, Olson KR. 2016.
Children Use Wealth Cues to Evaluate Others. PLoS One. 11(3):e0149360.

Steele CM and Aronson J. 1995.
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of
African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,
797-811.

Stoet G and Geary DC. 2012. Can stereotype threat explain
the sex gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of
General Psychology 16(1): 93-102.

Stone J. 2002. Battling doubt by avoiding
practice: The Effect of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white
athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1667-1678.

Taylor VJ and Walton GM. 2011. Stereotype threat undermines academic learning. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 37(8):1055-67.

van Ast VA, Spicer J, Smith EE, Schmer-Galunder S, Liberzon
I, Abelson JL, Wager TD. 2016. Brain Mechanisms of Social Threat Effects on
Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 26(2):544-556.

Wegmann KM. 2017. “His Skin Doesn’t Match What He Wants
to Do”: Children’s Perceptions of Stereotype Threat.
Am J Orthopsychiatry.
2017 Mar 9. doi: 10.1037/ort0000238. [Epub ahead of print]

Content last modified 9/2020

Title image of contemplative boy by tamckile / flickr

image of serious girl by flickrized / flicker

Source Link

related posts

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We willassume youare ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

%d bloggers like this: